As Canadians prepare for the upcoming federal election, critical issues like health care, the economy, and climate change are taking centre stage.
However, one critical connection that is often overlooked is how the intersection of all three affect our mental health, and how environmental trauma is being ignored at the highest level of policy. Continuous frequent and extreme disasters are traumatizing communities, and environmental policies play a crucial role in shaping mental health outcomes. The choices made by our next government regarding environmental regulations will not only shape Canada’s physical landscape, but will also profoundly influence the psychological well-being of its citizens.
Environmental disasters — such as wildfires, floods, and other extreme weather events — are becoming more frequent and intense, leading to widespread destruction and displacement. Beyond the immediate dangers, these events impose serious psychological burdens, such as anxiety, depression, and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). For example, communities in British Columbia have faced repeated wildfires, resulting in long-term mental health challenges for some of their residents.
Effective environmental policies are essential in reducing the risk of these disasters. Initiatives aimed at lowering carbon emissions, protecting natural habitats, and investing in sustainable infrastructure can lessen the chances and severity of environmental catastrophes. This not only helps the environment but also protects the mental health of Canadians.
Recent political developments hint at potential changes in environmental policies. Former Bank of Canada and Bank of England governor Mark Carney is now the prime minister of Canada, and he has eliminated Canada’s Consumer Carbon Tax. Simultaneously, the Conservative Party, led by Pierre Poilievre, had expressed intentions to abolish the federal carbon tax, citing affordability concerns during the cost-of-living crisis.
While these policy shifts aim to address economic challenges, they may inadvertently increase the risk of environmental disasters by weakening measures against climate change. This could lead to a rise in mental health issues across the country, and will eventually affect the economy.
The Role of Health care in Environmental Policy
The health care sector recognizes the vital connection between environmental factors and mental health. The Registered Nurses Association of Ontario has put forward a federal election platform that highlights the importance of addressing environmental determinants of health. Their recommendations include advancing comprehensive climate plans and enhancing environmental regulations, acknowledging that a healthy environment is fundamental to the overall well-being of Canadians.
We are left to wonder, when will the majority of Canadians recognize this fact? Ignoring environmental protections can put additional strain on the health care system, as rising mental health issues require more resources and attention.
As the election approaches, both voters and policymakers must consider the broader implications of environmental policies. Decisions that may seem economically beneficial in the short term could lead to long-term negative effects on both the environment and public mental health. On the other hand, strong environmental policies can act as preventive measures, reducing the occurrence of disaster-related mental health crises.
Investing in sustainable practises, maintaining effective carbon pricing, and enforcing environmental regulations are not just ecological or economic issues, they are vital components of a comprehensive public health strategy. By considering the mental health impacts of environmental policies, Canada can move toward a future that is not only greener but also healthier and more resilient.
This upcoming election, let us advocate for policies that protect our planet and promote the mental well-being of all Canadians. The health of our environment and the health of our people are deeply interconnected; safeguarding one ensures the prosperity of the other.
